don't see why you have an h^2 in the gravitational PE. s/b just mgh = pi(b^2-a^2)h rho g, no? I know your answer agrees with jackson but I don't see why the extra h is there.
Thanks for using the site, and asking this question. Allow me to clarify my thought process. You seem to agree that the gravitational potential is given by
PE = mgh
We are not given the mass of the oil, so let's replace it by density times volume
PE = ρVgh
The volume in question is the larger cylinder's volume minus the smaller cylinder's volume. Remember a cylinder's volume is base area times height.
PE = ρ(πb2h – πa2h)gh
Finally, factoring out some like terms we get
PE = ρπgh2(b2 – a2)
Which is what I had in equation 8. To answer your question in words, one h comes directly from mgh, and the other comes from the volume.
Hope that helps, and please follow up with any other questions.
-Josh
jackson 4.13
don't see why you have an h^2 in the gravitational PE. s/b just mgh = pi(b^2-a^2)h rho g, no? I know your answer agrees with jackson but I don't see why the extra h is there.
Clarification
Hi Peter,
Thanks for using the site, and asking this question. Allow me to clarify my thought process. You seem to agree that the gravitational potential is given by
PE = mgh
We are not given the mass of the oil, so let's replace it by density times volume
PE = ρVgh
The volume in question is the larger cylinder's volume minus the smaller cylinder's volume. Remember a cylinder's volume is base area times height.
PE = ρ(πb2h – πa2h)gh
Finally, factoring out some like terms we get
PE = ρπgh2(b2 – a2)
Which is what I had in equation 8. To answer your question in words, one h comes directly from mgh, and the other comes from the volume.
Hope that helps, and please follow up with any other questions.
-Josh